Early Colonial
leaders like (Adams, Jefferson, and Washington etc.) created a system of
civic participation called “representational democracy”. They set up a system
where by anyone that met minimum qualifications could run for an office. The
people would then choose their representatives in free and open elections. This would be an election system that was of
the people, by the people, and for the people. This system was more or less the
way things were done for 200+ years. Things began to change (and not for the
better) a few decades back. What we have now is a system that is NOT a
true representational democracy.
Today there are two elections in every major election. The first election is conducted by the
super wealthy, power brokers. They decide what two candidates are put before us
and we get to choose which of those two we want. It’s like when you were a kid
and you wanted peppermint ice cream but your mom said well you get to choose
between chocolate and vanilla and you asked her why you couldn't have something
else and she most likely told you it’s because I said so. So you either chose
chocolate or vanilla that is unless you elected not to choose at all.
That’s the metaphor for our election system today. CONSIDER this: 159 people in this country (the super wealthy)
contributed 60% of the total money raised by the super PAC’s 159! Four hundred fifty people (including the 159) contributed 88 % of all the
money raised and spent by Super PAC's in the last presidential race. 450 people determine who
gets the money it takes to win any nomination. It’s the super PAC(S) that determine which
person will be on the ballot representing the Republicans and Democrats. That’s why every Republican kisses Grover Norquist’s
ass and why the Koch brothers have so much say so. That’s why a Rand Paul would
never even come close to a ballot. That’s why if you want to run for president
and you don’t want to kowtow to the super PAC wealthy (the 450) you can only do
it by forming a third party. Both parties are run by super PAC(S). This is the
secret election inside the election.
So the first
corruption is the secret election inside the election.
Why is the
system so hopelessly grid-locked? Consider this: the one thing the super wealthy
(159 or 450) demand of their nominee is a promise. Promise to pay back money?
NO Promise of a cushy government job? Maybe they would want some job for some
of their friends but not for them. NO the one promise that must be given is: You must
never try to change the system. The super wealthy want things to stay
the same. Staying the same means they get more money and power. How many
senators, congressmen/women, and Presidents owe these people big time? All of
them?! Politicians want to get reelected and to do that you need the super
wealthy, powerful people and so you play ball. How many times have you heard someone say,
things need to change in Washington?
Well, forget it. They are not going to change with the way things are
structured now. The days of Jimmy Stewart as Mr. Smith going to Washington are
over.
The second corruption
is that you are not allowed to serve in office following your own convictions
and beliefs.
Then there is the wall of silence. No politician is allowed to talk about these
things. You are allowed to get huffy and puffy, cry and shout but not one past or
present politician will tell the American people how it all really works. Even when you leave office you are
expected to stay quiet for the most part..
Ever wonder why when politicians
are voted out they never do lengthy exposes on what really happens in the
halls, closets, and dark back rooms. There are no detailed tell all books of
secret deals, pay offs and of the careers that were made and destroyed. If you
don’t want the wrath of the super 450 all over you and some say it is worse
than the wrath of God, then you keep your mouth shut. So the truth is rarely
spoken while in office and its hush, hush out of office. Remember the
Congressman that lost his cool and shouted at the President, “You lie” during the
President’s first State of the Union. Well, he broke the rules. He was censured
and you never heard a peep from him again. Hell, Teddy Roosevelt was shot
making a campaign speech, and plenty of Presidents have been taken to task over
the years but it’s a new game today. You play by the rules or you don’t play at
all.
So the third corruption
is the wall of silence about the first two corruptions.
Consider this: why in
the world would Washington politicians who have the lowest citizen approval
rating ever in the history of congress (6%) risk further public condemnation by
allowing the fiscal cliff to be approached? Why would they allow the
unthinkable sequestration to take place? It is because these are politicians
that are “beholden” to the people that put them in office. People that don’t
want the system to change. People that
like things the way they are. And a
politician in office would rather suffer the anger of their constituents than
the anger of the super 450 they owe their careers to. Besides they have a built
in excuse and that is, “it’s the other side that is creating the log jam”. They get to self-righteously vilify the other
party, claim they are the victim, profess their concern for the working classes, kiss another member of the super 450’s ass and then go on to spend 65%
of their time in office (documented) working on their next reelection. Perfect!
Honestly, ask
yourself this question: if all the senators and congressmen were NOT
beholden to anyone ( I mean to
anyone) and could (never again) hold office after the term they are currently in is up, do you
think they could make some meaningful progress towards budget, guns, environment, and health care
reform? They are smart people and they could get things done, if they were
actually allowed to.
The founding fathers
would not recognize the political system we have today. They would quickly
and easily see that it is not the “representational democracy” they so
carefully crafted and put in place. They would wonder if this is really America
at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please state your opinion in a respectful way